子機(jī)構(gòu)
400-1816-180
logo
備考資訊 提分課程 答疑社區(qū)
登錄
注冊
題庫解析   >   假設(shè) 題型   >  
本題由chris提供

The cause of the wreck of the ship Edmund Fitzgerald

in a severe storm on Lake Superior is still unknown. When the sunken wreckage of the vessel was found, searchers discovered the hull in two pieces lying close together. The storm‘s violent waves would have caused separate pieces floating even briefly on the surface to drift apart. Therefore, the breakup of the hull can be ruled out as the cause of the sinking.


Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?


    A. Ships as large as the Edmund Fitzgerald rarely sink except in the most violent weather.

    B. Underwater currents at the time of the storm did not move the separated pieces of the hull together again.

    C. Pieces of the hull would have sunk more quickly than the intact hull would have.

    D. The waves of the storm were not violent enough to have caused the ship to break up on the surface.

    E. If the ship broke up before sinking, the pieces of the hull would not have remained on the surface for very long.


登錄申友雷哥GMAT,查看答案及解析

視頻解析

暫無視頻解析,點擊獲取更多視頻內(nèi)容

文字解析

答案:
B

原文中說

發(fā)現(xiàn)沉船時,hull斷成的兩截挨在一起。接著說,violent waves會讓漂浮在海面上的pieces離得更遠(yuǎn),(而現(xiàn)在是挨在一起的,言外之意是hull斷了的時候并沒有在海平面上,也就是說hull是在船沉了之后/在水里面斷裂的),所以并不是因為hull的斷裂導(dǎo)致的sinking(因為前面推理出船沉到水里后,hull才斷裂的)。 原文中是果因推理,果:打撈沉船時,hull的pieces挨在一起。推出 因:不是因為hull的斷裂導(dǎo)致的sinking。 assumption來加強(qiáng)果因之間的聯(lián)系,即排除它因

GMAT會員

提交
OG視頻
申友雷哥GMAT小助手

添加官方小助手微信
了解更多GMAT考試與咨詢

100蜜糖購買當(dāng)前課程

當(dāng)前蜜糖數(shù):顆 去獲取

立即購買 取消購買

吉祥物小蜜蜂

關(guān)注公眾號

公眾號

掃碼關(guān)注申友雷哥GMAT公眾號

立即獲取12GGMAT核心資料

微信咨詢

申友在線咨詢二維碼圖片

掃碼添加申友雷哥GMAT官方助手

立即咨詢GMAT網(wǎng)課面授課程

聯(lián)系申友雷哥 全國免費咨詢熱線: 400-1816-180

Copyright ? 2021 All Right Reserved 申友雷哥教育 版權(quán)所有 滬ICP備17005516號-3 免責(zé)聲明 互聯(lián)網(wǎng)經(jīng)營許可證編號:滬B2-20210282